Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elizabeth Bobrick's avatar

New reader here. First, you’re a great storyteller. Two posts and I feel as though I can hear you speak. Super characterization all around - the dad, the kids, everyone. I had no idea what was going to happen. As a long time teacher of a different subject to many different kinds of students, I’m telling you that your kids are lucky to have you because you care enough about them to risk being humiliated. I’m fist-bumping you. 🤜🏻

Expand full comment
Nico's avatar

New here, love the story and love the page! A question and also perhaps unsolicited advice from a non-teacher, but someone who works in an environment where negotiation and power struggles are very common. Right after you call "Not in!" and the student starts to complain, why did you continue with an explanation? By trying to give an explanation in the moment ("Your back foot was outside the end zone when you caught it [...]"), it only opens the door for further rebuttal (which he gave by storming off). Instead, sticking to just "Not in! One more pass to score, x team needs one more pass to score!" doesn't open up the situation to rebuttal. This won't guarantee he won't storm off (as you say, he still has trouble controlling his emotions) but it at least does not INVITE the behavior. Additionally, it helps continue to teach/reinforce roles and responsibilities, as the referee makes the calls, and the players have to deal with them (by attempting another pass). I.e., the teaching moment from perhaps a sports perspective is that the ruling on the fields are not a negotiation. When you're not in a negotiation, there's no need to explain 'your side' - especially not in the exact moment when tension is high. You mention your thoughts "A student who couldn’t get out of his own skull and just realize he needed to make one more pass." but how could he? You engaged him in a debate, so he's now fully focused only on the debate of whether he's in or out. Immature people (kids and adults lol) are not always capable of self-regulating priority, so their thought process just locks into whatever is right in front of them, which in this case was "the debate". By only repeating back "x team needs one more pass!" it attempts to put this thought (winning the game) higher in their attention's priority. A small thing, but I see as worth mentioning, because as an outside viewer it really seems as if you unknowingly instigated the 'meltdown'.

Expand full comment
72 more comments...

No posts